Why it matters in practice
Within Source Code Auditing, Ruby Source Code Auditing changes how scope, prerequisites and evidence should be handled. Focus on the concrete asset or data flow under test, record the assumptions that make the condition exploitable and connect verified behavior to an operational consequence and remediation decision.
This note keeps Ruby Source Code Auditing tied to offensive workflow: what to observe, what to prove, what usually goes wrong, and which references remain useful once an assessment moves from planning into active validation.
Primary coverage
The coverage below turns Ruby Source Code Auditing into an assessment map for Source Code Auditing: identify the relevant system boundary, select a safe validation path, preserve evidence and record uncertainty before drawing a conclusion.
- Identify stored cross-site scripting
- Identify SQL injection
- Identify parameter tampering
- Identify arbitrary file download
- Identify arbitrary file upload
- Identify cookies without the HttpOnly flag
- Identify insufficient form validation
- Identify improper exception handling
- Identify missing request-forgery protection
- Identify use of broken cryptography
Selected public references
- Semgrep Documentationsemgrep.dev/docs/
- CodeQL Documentationcodeql.github.com/docs/
- OWASP Code Review Guideowasp.org/www-project-code-review-guide/
- MITRE CWEcwe.mitre.org/top25/archive/2024/2024_cwe_top25.html