HackTheCore
ResearchAI SecurityRAG, Agents & Tool Abuse

AI Security // Retrieval, Agents & Tooling

RAG, Agents & Tool Abuse

RAG, Agents & Tool Abuse is presented here as a field note for offensive security work. The emphasis is on attack surface, validation logic, common failure patterns, operator choices and the public references worth keeping nearby during a live assessment.

field noteassessment referencepublic sources

Why it matters in practice

RAG, Agents & Tool Abuse matters because it shapes how an operator scopes the work, chooses validation steps, prioritizes evidence and explains risk. The point is not to accumulate trivia; it is to understand which control boundary is in play and how that boundary can fail under realistic pressure.

This note keeps rag, agents & tool abuse tied to offensive workflow: what to observe, what to prove, what usually goes wrong, and which references remain useful once an assessment moves from planning into active validation.

Primary coverage

  • Poison retrieval corpora and test whether malicious instructions survive chunking and ranking.
  • Review connector permissions, delegated tokens and over-broad tool access.
  • Test whether agents can call actions from weak evidence or fabricated confidence.
  • Check confirmation prompts, approval bypass paths and replay of sensitive actions.
  • Trace whether outputs can exfiltrate data from memory, tools, connectors or hidden context.

Selected public references

The practical model is simple: what can the model see, what can it call, what can it change, and who believes the answer enough to act on it. Most agent abuse findings reduce to insecure orchestration with a language layer on top.

Selected public references